Medicines which are used to treat human aliments should always be
tested on human beings, not animals. But, is that all that you need human provers for testing? Or is there some special category of human race selected for this project?
 |
| Image Source - https://pixabay.com/en/pharmacy-isolated-health-medical-1729445/ |
Yes, some special category of human race selected for this
process.
Who come under this category?
Yes, under this category, some special people come. These special people are those who have healthy human status. Yes, provers need to have clean record of healthy human beings, if they are to be selected for testing medicines going to be used for treating human aliments.
Why it is so, why sick category humans cannot be selected?
This is because, first of all because when on both sick and healthy category humans action of drug is tested, then symptoms which drug tested produce in one is very much different from other.
Who come under this category?
Yes, under this category, some special people come. These special people are those who have healthy human status. Yes, provers need to have clean record of healthy human beings, if they are to be selected for testing medicines going to be used for treating human aliments.
Why it is so, why sick category humans cannot be selected?
This is because, first of all because when on both sick and healthy category humans action of drug is tested, then symptoms which drug tested produce in one is very much different from other.
- Healthy category humans have no symptoms. So, when medicine is tested on them, we have proof that they are drug symptoms.
- But, when they are tested on diseased one, then there is no proof that they are medicine symptoms or disease symptoms because drug tested 1st modify disease symptoms and 2nd both kind of symptoms, that is, both drug symptoms as well as disease symptoms got so mug up in system, that it becomes hard to differentiate medicine symptoms from disease symptoms.
Next know- What are accessory symptoms of medicine?